Saturday, August 15, 2020




SIR HARRY HOTSPUR OF HUMBLETHWAITE

Anthony Trollope (1815-1882)

Sir Harry's principal concern, contemplating his will, has to do with maintaining the family's reputation as upper  class stewards of the lands, villages and inhabitants of the Hotspur holdings;  a relationship that has lasted 400 years and that is now in some danger of disarray due to the death of the elder son at a premature age.  Harry sees that the best solution is to marry his daughter Emily to a suitable suitor with a lot of money and a title, but the most obvious candidate, Lord Alfred, is devoid of any merit in Emily's eyes.  There's another possibility, cousin George Hotspur, but he's not regarded as honorable or rich.  In fact, he, as a result of a Parisian upbringing and an overly liberal education, is somewhat of a rakehell whose only interests are gambling, drinking and card sharpery.  Somewhat at a loss, Sir Harry throws a party and invites the cousin, hoping against hope that he is reformable and that faced with the chance of becoming wealthy and powerful, he might abandon his heedless ways and become a responsible citizen and a worthy husband for his daughter.

So Emily falls in love with the young ne'er-do-well, convinced that she can change him into a loyal servitor and trustworthy land owner.  Young Harry is deeply in debt to London money-lenders and his first thought is to somehow influence Sir Harry to pay off his debts.  But he's such a waster that, even though Emily loves him, it seems like throwing money down the drain to regularize cousin Harry's financial affairs.  Later it's revealed that not only is he in debt, but he's a criminal, having cheated another young man with marked cards.  Emily discovers all this but loves him anyway, being the sort of young lady who, once committed, never changes her mind.

After a certain amount of waffling about, with Harry trying to act civilized and Emily trying to convince her father that he's salvageable, Sir Harry agrees to pay the bills and to provide an annual income for Harry of 500 L's a year.  But even so, the young villain eventually realizes that being stuck in the country for the rest of his life is not a situation that appeals to him.  He would much rather marry his actress girl-friend and drink brandy and gamble with his friends, than marry Emily and spend his life cooped up in a structured rural farming society. which he didn't know anything about anyhow.

Devastated (spoiler alert), Sir Harry and his wife and daughter travel to Italy in hopes of distracting Emily from her single-minded love, but to no avail.  She passes away and is buried in Lugano.  Returning home, Sir Harry creates a new will, leaving everything to a rich relative of his wife.

This was in a way an unsatisfactory book, partly because the plot was overly obvious, and the tragic ending was evident early in the denouement.  The main interest to me lay in Trollope's astute and well presented observations, psychological and social.  I learned more about him in this book than in the Barsetshire novels.  Trollope has a sort of kaleidoscopic ability to study his characters while he's developing their roles:  with a twist of the kaleidoscope sleeve, he's able to view his people from an entirely new viewpoint, and describe their behaviors from a stance that might not have been previously obvious to the reader, or anticipated through the plot development.  These sorts of changes also indicate possible events that may have transpired in Trollope's own life.  As in:  how did he become aware of the feelings and actions of gamblers and card-players if he hadn't experienced similar situations in his own life?  And it's not only in small details that this sort of connection is evinced;  it pervades the whole book:  he reveals throughout his familiarity with social behavior on all levels of British society as well as his feelings about how individuals cope with the invisible mores which govern their lives. 

It was quite surprising and enlightening, a side of Trollope i hadn't noticed in such a powerful way before, and on the basis of that, i'd recommend the book highly.  I'm sure other readers are familiar with this talent on the part of T, and this is in all probability one reason why he's so popular.  So maybe it just took this long for me to get it, haha...  anyway, it was an unusual experience and will most likely lead this reader to more of his books...

15 comments:

  1. Trollope really does have pretty amazing social resources: when he writes about gamblers & rakehells he knows his stuff, when he writes about wealthy aristocrats he knows his stuff; when he writes about parsons or country farmers or whatever, he knows his stuff. I wonder if anybody has that range of acquaintances anymore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i recall reading somewhere in the last year or two that the last person who actually knew most human knowledge lived in the 17th C. (i think)... i wonder if T's omsbud-like lore had anything to do with his job: i picture him riding along on a horse, delving into people's mail and chortling too himself...

      Delete
  2. Great review. I think that I have read 15 Trollope novels but I have not read the one. You really hit it in the head in the way that you describe the way that Trollope creates characters. He really creates real people. The kaleidoscope is a good analogy. I probably will eventually read this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it's probably not as exciting as his other novels, but his perception and understanding of his characters is perhaps more evident for that reason... it's almost like a mirror into the English society of the 1800's...

      Delete
  3. Great discussion on the author's characterization. And I am entirely NOT surprised that the daughter died of her broken heart.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i was a little surprised. altho it was pretty easy to guess where the plot was going, i wasn't sure how T wound wind things up... but he didn't put a more glamorous finale on it, which meant to me that the book was, in part, intended to be a sort of admonishment/tract narrative about the evils of modern society. it wouldn't do, in that case, to beautify it...

      Delete
    2. It just seemed to me like something that would happen in the era/setting.

      Delete
    3. artistically required, i guess...

      Delete
  4. Hi Mudpuddle.

    That is what I also noticed about Trollope's works. He makes perspicacious observations on human nature and expresses his points so well and powerfully. I haven't read this one. Based on your review, I'll guess I'll wait. I don't think I have it and I have a lot of other Trollope novels that I do have and need to read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i was surprised about how prevalent this kind of analysis was in the book. i didn't notice it that much in the Barchester novels.. i guess i'll have to read his political ones to see if it's true there, also... i don't know how many novels he wrote, but it was a lot, i know...

      Delete
  5. Hmm ... funny name ....
    NOUN
    archaic
    a rash, impetuous person.
    synonyms:
    madcap · daredevil · tearaway · loony · nut · nutter · screwball · desperado
    Well, just a bit of whimsy for you ....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course, I refer to the name Hotspur .....

      Delete
    2. i got that... tx, RT, for the research...

      Delete